country profile

Papua New Guinea

East Asia & PacificLower middle income10.58M population

Last updated May 3, 2026

FacebookTwitter/XLinkedInReddit
Fragile/Conflict-Affected Country: This country is classified as experiencing institutional and social fragility.

Composite GEFRI Score

Critically unprepared

Papua New Guinea shows critically low readiness to meet the challenges and opportunities of education in a rapidly changing world (16th percentile worldwide). Core capabilities are weak across most dimensions, and essential systems face significant constraints. Higher scores indicate a system that is better prepared to anticipate and shape the future of learning.

26.21Composite score
Global percentile
16th
Global rank
#151
Regional rank
#24
Viewing data for
Infrastructure
17.54
4th percentileGlobal avg. 54.77
Human Capital
33.97
23rd percentileGlobal avg. 47.01
Innovation
30.14
16th percentileGlobal avg. 45.21
Governance
39.38
37th percentileGlobal avg. 47.75
Access & Parity
10.00
32nd percentileGlobal avg. 49.65

Country profile

Papua New Guinea trails global peers in Human Capital (34, 23rd percentile), Innovation (30, 16th percentile), GEFRI Composite (26, 16th percentile), and Infrastructure (18, 4th percentile). A coordinated reform effort is needed to strengthen education futures readiness.

Uneven scores across dimensions highlight areas that need targeted coordination. Limited electricity or internet coverage still constrains classrooms, preventing large-scale digital instruction. Literacy or tertiary enrollment gaps thin the talent pipeline and limit the country’s capacity to develop future-ready skills.

Sparse R&D investment and a small research workforce slow experimentation and delay new ideas from reaching learners. Policy execution and regulatory capacity remain weak, leaving reforms fragmented and hard to sustain. Gender parity leans toward boys in secondary pathways, signalling persistent barriers for girls.

Regionally, School Access and Gender Parity lags peers the most, signalling where investment could have the highest impact.

Note: Most indicators rely on observed data, offering a dependable evidence base for decisions.

Key insights

  • Falls below many peers at the 16th percentile.
  • Places 151st worldwide.
  • Holds a regional position of 24th within East Asia & Pacific.
  • Scores range from Governance (39.4) to Access & Parity (10.0), reflecting variation across dimensions.
  • Trails regional peers most clearly in Access & Parity.

Regional peers: East Asia & Pacific

Composite GEFRI Score

Global rankRegional rankCountryScore
21Hong Kong SAR, China78.84
32Korea, Rep.78.17
43Singapore77.81
124Australia75.95
135Japan75.88
196New Zealand73.08
NauruMicrostate61.59
Northern Mariana IslandsMicrostate61.43
487Brunei Darussalam61.13
American SamoaMicrostate61.09
498Macao SAR, China61.06
GuamMicrostate60.74
509Thailand60.74
5310Indonesia60.55
5511Fiji60.34
New CaledoniaMicrostate59.24
French PolynesiaMicrostate58.11
PalauMicrostate57.53
6712Viet Nam57.46
6913Mongolia57.00
7314Malaysia56.66
7715China55.08
8516Philippines52.64
SamoaMicrostate51.59
TuvaluFCSMicrostate49.72
TongaMicrostate48.28
KiribatiFCSMicrostate46.97
Marshall IslandsFCSMicrostate46.38
Micronesia, Fed. Sts.FCSMicrostate42.67
11017Timor-LesteFCS41.47
11118Vanuatu41.25
12219Korea, Dem. People's Rep.36.56
12720Cambodia33.92
12821MyanmarFCS33.78
13622Lao PDR31.66
13823Solomon IslandsFCS31.58
15124Papua New GuineaFCS26.21