country profile

Kiribati

East Asia & PacificLower middle income135K population

Last updated June 1, 2026

FacebookTwitter/XLinkedInReddit

Fragile/Conflict-Affected Country: This country is classified as experiencing institutional and social fragility.

In fragile and conflict-affected settings, severe data gaps, rapid disruption, and uneven reporting can distort index values. These scores should be read as a limited signal, not a complete picture of conditions in the country.

Microstate notice: This country is classified as a microstate (population under 300,000) and is indexed but not included in GEFRI global or regional rankings.

Composite GEFRI Score

Emerging readiness

Kiribati demonstrates early-stage readiness to meet the challenges and opportunities of education in a rapidly changing world (41st percentile worldwide). Investments are generating initial gains, yet substantial gaps persist in several dimensions.

46.97Composite score
Global percentile
41st
Global rank
Not ranked (microstate)
Regional rank
Not ranked (microstate)
Viewing data for
Infrastructure
53.30
36th percentileGlobal avg. 54.93
Human Capital
63.98
91st percentileGlobal avg. 47.21
Innovation
19.65
3rd percentileGlobal avg. 45.28
Governance
57.92
71st percentileGlobal avg. 47.86
Access & Parity
40.00
43rd percentileGlobal avg. 49.93

Country profile

Kiribati shows strong future-readiness momentum, with clear strengths in Human Capital (64, 91st percentile).

Uneven scores across dimensions highlight areas that need targeted coordination. High internet adoption enables broad participation in digital learning and innovation. Limited tertiary enrollment narrows future talent pipelines and innovation capacity.

Sparse R&D investment and a small research workforce slow experimentation and delay new ideas from reaching learners. Policy execution and regulatory capacity remain weak, leaving reforms fragmented and hard to sustain. Girls outperform boys in secondary pathways, adding pressure to address male dropout risks.

Infrastructure and GEFRI Composite present a near-term leapfrog opportunity: performance is just below the global average, backed by enough observed data to support forward planning. Regionally, Innovation lags peers the most, signalling where investment could have the highest impact.

Challenges: Innovation (20, 3rd percentile). Closing these gaps will be key to sustaining progress.

Areas with room to grow: Infrastructure (53, 36th percentile), GEFRI Composite (47, 41st percentile) and School Access and Gender Parity (40, 43rd percentile). These dimensions sit close to global norms and could accelerate quickly with targeted investment.

Note: Several indicators use imputed values. Policymakers and planners should validate results further before committing to major initiatives.

Key insights

Scores range from Human Capital (64.0) to Innovation (19.6), reflecting variation across dimensions.

Trails regional peers most clearly in Innovation.

Regional peers: East Asia & Pacific

Composite GEFRI Score

Global rankRegional rankCountryScore
21Hong Kong SAR, China78.84
32Korea, Rep.78.17
43Singapore77.81
124Australia75.95
135Japan75.88
196New Zealand73.08
NauruMicrostate61.59
Northern Mariana IslandsMicrostate61.43
487Brunei Darussalam61.13
American SamoaMicrostate61.09
498Macao SAR, China61.06
GuamMicrostate60.74
509Thailand60.74
5310Indonesia60.55
5511Fiji60.34
New CaledoniaMicrostate59.24
French PolynesiaMicrostate58.11
PalauMicrostate57.53
6712Viet Nam57.46
6913Mongolia57.00
7314Malaysia56.66
7715China55.08
8516Philippines52.64
SamoaMicrostate51.59
TuvaluFCSMicrostate49.72
TongaMicrostate48.28
KiribatiFCSMicrostate46.97
Marshall IslandsFCSMicrostate46.38
Micronesia, Fed. Sts.FCSMicrostate42.67
11017Timor-LesteFCS41.47
11118Vanuatu41.25
12219Korea, Dem. People's Rep.36.56
12720Cambodia33.92
12821MyanmarFCS33.78
13622Lao PDR31.66
13823Solomon IslandsFCS31.58
15124Papua New GuineaFCS26.21