country profile

Lao PDR

East Asia & PacificLower middle income7.87M population

Last updated August 4, 2026

FacebookTwitter/XLinkedInReddit
Severely underprepared

Composite GEFRI Score

Limited relative strength in Infrastructure, with deep gaps in Access & Parity

Lao PDR shows severely limited readiness to meet the challenges and opportunities of education in a rapidly changing world (20th percentile worldwide). Key structural conditions limit capacity to plan, implement, and sustain forward-looking reforms.

36.90Composite score
Global percentile
20th
Global rank
#143
Regional rank
#23
Viewing data for
Progressing readiness
Infrastructure
61.97
30th percentileGlobal avg. 70.44
Severely underprepared
Human Capital
41.75
13th percentileGlobal avg. 66.18
Severely underprepared
Innovation
34.22
28th percentileGlobal avg. 48.64
Critically unprepared
Governance
28.88
20th percentileGlobal avg. 47.07
Critically unprepared
Access & Parity
17.69
19th percentileGlobal avg. 60.85

Country profile

Lao PDR faces substantial readiness constraints across core dimensions. Its weakest results are in Human Capital (42, 13th percentile), GEFRI Composite (37, 20th percentile), Innovation (34, 28th percentile), Governance (29, 20th percentile) and School Access and Gender Parity (18, 19th percentile). These gaps continue to weigh on overall readiness.

Uneven scores across dimensions show where readiness conditions are less aligned. Literacy or tertiary enrollment gaps thin the talent pipeline and limit the country’s capacity to develop future-ready skills.

Sparse R&D investment and a small research workforce slow experimentation and delay new ideas from reaching learners. Policy execution and regulatory capacity remain weak, leaving reforms fragmented and hard to sustain. Gender parity leans toward boys in secondary pathways, signalling persistent barriers for girls.

Regionally, School Access and Gender Parity lags peers the most, signalling where investment could have the highest impact.

Most indicators are observed rather than imputed, so estimation uncertainty is limited.

Key insights

Falls below many peers at the 20th percentile.

Places 143rd worldwide.

Holds a regional position of 23rd within East Asia & Pacific.

Scores range from Infrastructure (62.0) to Access & Parity (17.7), reflecting variation across dimensions.

Trails regional peers most clearly in Access & Parity.

Regional peers: East Asia & Pacific

Composite GEFRI Score

Global rankRegional rankCountryScore
71Singapore87.75
82Korea, Rep.87.61
93Australia87.58
124Japan86.42
145New Zealand86.25
166Hong Kong SAR, China85.13
PalauMicrostate73.62
NauruMicrostate72.35
517Thailand71.65
528Brunei Darussalam71.24
GuamMicrostate70.43
569China70.26
New CaledoniaMicrostate69.53
American SamoaMicrostate69.29
5910Malaysia69.27
Northern Mariana IslandsMicrostate69.27
6511Macao SAR, China68.91
6612Fiji68.84
7013Mongolia68.44
French PolynesiaMicrostate67.53
7414Indonesia67.24
7515Viet Nam67.00
TongaMicrostate62.06
SamoaMicrostate61.69
9116Philippines60.80
TuvaluFCSMicrostate59.38
Marshall IslandsFCSMicrostate56.13
10917Vanuatu54.76
KiribatiFCSMicrostate49.99
11818Timor-LesteFCS47.72
Micronesia, Fed. Sts.FCSMicrostate47.06
12419Cambodia44.53
12520Korea, Dem. People's Rep.44.29
13521Solomon IslandsFCS40.40
14222MyanmarFCS37.14
14323Lao PDR36.90
15624Papua New GuineaFCS31.85