Country profile

Papua New Guinea

East Asia & PacificLower middle income10.58M inhabitants

Last updated April 1, 2026

FacebookTwitter/XLinkedInReddit
Fragile/Conflict-Affected Country: This country is classified as experiencing institutional and social fragility. Data may not reflect the current situation due to instability.

Composite GEFRI Score

Critically unprepared

Papua New Guinea is critically unprepared for education futures (12th percentile worldwide). Core capabilities are weak across most dimensions, and essential systems face significant constraints. Higher scores indicate a system that is better prepared to anticipate and shape the future of learning.

23.87Composite score
Global percentile
12th
Global rank
#156
Regional rank
#24
Viewing data for
Infrastructure
15.35
3rd percentileGlobal avg. 59.93
Human Capital
34.01
23rd percentileGlobal avg. 47.03
Innovation
25.58
14th percentileGlobal avg. 42.53
Governance
39.38
36th percentileGlobal avg. 47.71
Access & Parity
5.00
33rd percentileGlobal avg. 43.89

Country profile

Papua New Guinea trails global peers in Human Capital (34, 23rd percentile), Innovation (26, 14th percentile), and Infrastructure (15, 3rd percentile). A coordinated reform effort is needed to strengthen education futures readiness.

Uneven scores across dimensions highlight areas that need targeted coordination. Limited electricity or internet coverage still constrains classrooms, preventing large-scale digital instruction. Literacy or tertiary enrollment gaps thin the talent pipeline and limit the country’s capacity to develop future-ready skills.

Sparse R&D investment and a small research workforce slow experimentation and delay new ideas from reaching learners. Policy execution and regulatory capacity remain weak, leaving reforms fragmented and hard to sustain. Gender parity leans toward boys in secondary pathways, signalling persistent barriers for girls.

Note: Several indicators use imputed values. Policymakers and planners should validate results further before committing to major initiatives.

Key insights

  • Falls below many peers at the 12th percentile.
  • Places 156th worldwide.
  • Holds a regional position of 24th within East Asia & Pacific.
  • Scores range from Governance (39.4) to Access & Parity (5.0), reflecting variation across dimensions.
  • Trails regional peers most clearly in Infrastructure.

Regional peers: East Asia & Pacific

Composite GEFRI score

Global rankRegional rankCountryScore
21Korea, Rep.79.45
32Hong Kong SAR, China77.87
43Singapore77.24
244Japan70.54
255Australia70.53
346New Zealand68.21
——NauruMicrostate63.70
——PalauMicrostate63.63
——Northern Mariana IslandsMicrostate63.05
487Thailand61.33
——American SamoaMicrostate61.26
498Brunei Darussalam61.14
——GuamMicrostate60.51
549Indonesia60.06
5610Macao SAR, China59.92
——New CaledoniaMicrostate59.48
——French PolynesiaMicrostate58.74
6511Fiji57.04
6712Mongolia56.70
6813China56.42
7014Malaysia56.09
8015Philippines53.28
——TuvaluFCSMicrostate52.99
——SamoaMicrostate52.80
8316Viet Nam52.16
——TongaMicrostate46.68
——Marshall IslandsFCSMicrostate46.22
——KiribatiFCSMicrostate46.13
10617Timor-LesteFCS41.78
——Micronesia, Fed. Sts.FCSMicrostate40.44
11318Vanuatu39.11
11719Korea, Dem. People's Rep.37.93
12520MyanmarFCS35.50
13121Cambodia32.82
13622Solomon IslandsFCS31.58
13823Lao PDR30.78
15624Papua New GuineaFCS23.87