country profile

Papua New Guinea

East Asia & PacificLower middle income10.76M population

Last updated July 15, 2026

FacebookTwitter/XLinkedInReddit

Fragile/Conflict-Affected Country: This country is classified as experiencing conflict.

In fragile and conflict-affected settings, severe data gaps, rapid disruption, and uneven reporting can distort index values. These scores should be read as a limited signal, not a complete picture of conditions in the country.

Critically unprepared

Composite GEFRI Score

Systemwide critical constraints

Papua New Guinea shows critically low readiness to meet the challenges and opportunities of education in a rapidly changing world (18th percentile worldwide). Core capabilities are weak across most dimensions, and essential systems face significant constraints.

27.72Composite score
Global percentile
18th
Global rank
#147
Regional rank
#23
Viewing data for
Critically unprepared
Infrastructure
23.25
7th percentileGlobal avg. 55.13
Severely underprepared
Human Capital
34.23
22nd percentileGlobal avg. 47.36
Severely underprepared
Innovation
40.29
41st percentileGlobal avg. 46.19
Severely underprepared
Governance
35.81
34th percentileGlobal avg. 47.46
Critically unprepared
Access & Parity
5.00
19th percentileGlobal avg. 48.49

Country profile

Papua New Guinea faces substantial readiness constraints across core dimensions. Its weakest results are in Human Capital (34, 22nd percentile), GEFRI Composite (28, 18th percentile), Infrastructure (23, 7th percentile) and School Access and Gender Parity (5, 19th percentile). These gaps continue to weigh on overall readiness.

Uneven scores across dimensions show where readiness conditions are less aligned. Limited electricity or internet coverage still constrains classrooms, preventing large-scale digital instruction. Literacy or tertiary enrollment gaps thin the talent pipeline and limit the country’s capacity to develop future-ready skills.

Sparse R&D investment and a small research workforce slow experimentation and delay new ideas from reaching learners. Policy execution and regulatory capacity remain weak, leaving reforms fragmented and hard to sustain. Girls outperform boys in secondary pathways, adding pressure to address male dropout risks.

Some indicators are imputed, so the profile should be read with moderate caution.

Key insights

Falls below many peers at the 18th percentile.

Places 147th worldwide.

Holds a regional position of 23rd within East Asia & Pacific.

Scores range from Innovation (40.3) to Access & Parity (5.0), reflecting variation across dimensions.

Trails regional peers most clearly in Access & Parity.

Regional peers: East Asia & Pacific

Composite GEFRI Score

Global rankRegional rankCountryScore
21Korea, Rep.77.90
32Hong Kong SAR, China77.59
43Singapore77.58
124Japan76.03
145Australia75.84
206New Zealand72.96
467Brunei Darussalam61.47
NauruMicrostate60.97
Northern Mariana IslandsMicrostate60.89
498Fiji60.57
509Thailand60.56
GuamMicrostate59.78
New CaledoniaMicrostate59.45
PalauMicrostate59.12
American SamoaMicrostate58.64
6110Macao SAR, China58.41
French PolynesiaMicrostate57.22
6811Indonesia56.89
6912Mongolia56.89
7113Malaysia56.62
7314Viet Nam55.90
7515China55.59
8716Philippines51.84
SamoaMicrostate51.51
TuvaluFCSMicrostate51.41
TongaMicrostate48.23
KiribatiFCSMicrostate46.37
Marshall IslandsFCSMicrostate45.13
Micronesia, Fed. Sts.FCSMicrostate41.97
11217Vanuatu40.83
11318Timor-LesteFCS40.80
11519Korea, Dem. People's Rep.39.28
12320Cambodia35.88
13121Solomon IslandsFCS33.48
13422Lao PDR32.64
14723Papua New GuineaFCS27.72
15124MyanmarFCS26.22