country profile

Timor-Leste

East Asia & PacificLower middle income1.42M population

Last updated July 1, 2026

FacebookTwitter/XLinkedInReddit

Fragile/Conflict-Affected Country: This country is classified as experiencing institutional and social fragility.

In fragile and conflict-affected settings, severe data gaps, rapid disruption, and uneven reporting can distort index values. These scores should be read as a limited signal, not a complete picture of conditions in the country.

Severely underprepared

Composite GEFRI Score

Severe readiness constraints across dimensions

Timor-Leste shows severely limited readiness to meet the challenges and opportunities of education in a rapidly changing world (38th percentile worldwide). Key structural conditions limit capacity to plan, implement, and sustain forward-looking reforms.

40.85Composite score
Global percentile
38th
Global rank
#111
Regional rank
#17
Viewing data for
Emerging readiness
Infrastructure
47.64
29th percentileGlobal avg. 54.95
Severely underprepared
Human Capital
40.61
30th percentileGlobal avg. 47.14
Severely underprepared
Innovation
33.94
26th percentileGlobal avg. 45.34
Severely underprepared
Governance
42.07
44th percentileGlobal avg. 47.93
Severely underprepared
Access & Parity
40.00
43rd percentileGlobal avg. 49.93

Country profile

Timor-Leste faces substantial readiness constraints across core dimensions. Its weakest results are in Innovation (34, 26th percentile). These gaps continue to weigh on overall readiness.

Dimension scores cluster tightly, showing the system operates with balanced readiness. Low internet adoption slows digital participation and constrains system-wide modernization. Literacy or tertiary enrollment gaps thin the talent pipeline and limit the country’s capacity to develop future-ready skills.

Sparse R&D investment and a small research workforce slow experimentation and delay new ideas from reaching learners. Policy execution and regulatory capacity remain weak, leaving reforms fragmented and hard to sustain. Girls outperform boys in secondary pathways, adding pressure to address male dropout risks.

Infrastructure, Governance and Human Capital present a near-term leapfrog opportunity: performance is just below the global average, backed by enough observed data to support forward planning. Regionally, School Access and Gender Parity lags peers the most, signalling where investment could have the highest impact.

Most indicators are observed rather than imputed, so estimation uncertainty is limited.

Key insights

Falls below many peers at the 38th percentile.

Places 111th worldwide.

Holds a regional position of 17th within East Asia & Pacific.

Scores range from Infrastructure (47.6) to Innovation (33.9), reflecting variation across dimensions.

Trails regional peers most clearly in Access & Parity.

Regional peers: East Asia & Pacific

Composite GEFRI Score

Global rankRegional rankCountryScore
21Korea, Rep.77.95
32Hong Kong SAR, China77.62
43Singapore77.59
124Japan76.08
145Australia75.89
206New Zealand73.01
NauruMicrostate60.91
487Fiji60.84
Northern Mariana IslandsMicrostate60.77
508Thailand60.64
549Brunei Darussalam60.25
5510Indonesia59.51
GuamMicrostate59.03
American SamoaMicrostate58.57
6311Macao SAR, China58.24
6612Viet Nam57.81
New CaledoniaMicrostate57.39
7013Mongolia57.06
PalauMicrostate56.92
7314Malaysia56.68
French PolynesiaMicrostate56.07
7515China55.64
8516Philippines52.11
SamoaMicrostate51.42
TuvaluFCSMicrostate49.03
TongaMicrostate48.36
KiribatiFCSMicrostate46.12
Marshall IslandsFCSMicrostate45.41
Micronesia, Fed. Sts.FCSMicrostate41.64
11117Timor-LesteFCS40.85
11318Vanuatu40.42
11819Korea, Dem. People's Rep.37.53
13020MyanmarFCS33.78
13121Cambodia33.74
13422Lao PDR32.35
14023Solomon IslandsFCS31.28
15324Papua New GuineaFCS25.62