Country profile

Timor-Leste

East Asia & PacificLower middle income1.40M inhabitants

Last updated February 1, 2026

FacebookTwitter/XLinkedInReddit
Fragile/Conflict-Affected Country: This country is classified as experiencing institutional and social fragility. Data may not reflect the current situation due to instability.

Composite GEFRI Score

Severely underprepared

Timor-Leste is severely underprepared (38th percentile worldwide). Key structural conditions limit capacity to plan, implement, and sustain forward-looking reforms. Higher scores indicate a system that is better prepared to anticipate and shape the future of learning.

41.12Composite score
Global percentile
38th
Global rank
#110
Regional rank
#17
Viewing data for
Infrastructure
48.94
29th percentileGlobal avg. 56.42
Human Capital
41.60
31st percentileGlobal avg. 46.98
Innovation
29.94
27th percentileGlobal avg. 42.60
Governance
45.14
50th percentileGlobal avg. 47.71
Access & Parity
40.00
42nd percentileGlobal avg. 50.60

Country profile

Timor-Leste trails global peers in Innovation (30, 27th percentile). A coordinated reform effort is needed to strengthen education futures readiness.

Dimension scores cluster tightly, showing the system operates with balanced readiness. Low internet adoption slows digital participation and constrains system-wide modernization. Literacy or tertiary enrollment gaps thin the talent pipeline and limit the country’s capacity to develop future-ready skills.

Sparse R&D investment and a small research workforce slow experimentation and delay new ideas from reaching learners. Policy execution and regulatory capacity remain weak, leaving reforms fragmented and hard to sustain. Girls outperform boys in secondary pathways, adding pressure to address male dropout risks.

Infrastructure, Governance, and Human Capital present a near-term leapfrog opportunity: performance is just below the global average, backed by enough observed data to support forward planning. Regionally, School Access and Gender Parity lags peers the most, signalling where investment could have the highest impact.

Note: Most indicators rely on observed data, offering a dependable evidence base for decisions.

Key insights

  • Falls below many peers at the 38th percentile.
  • Places 110th worldwide.
  • Holds a regional position of 17th within East Asia & Pacific.
  • Scores range from Infrastructure (48.9) to Innovation (29.9), reflecting variation across dimensions.
  • Trails regional peers most clearly in Access & Parity.

Regional peers: East Asia & Pacific

Composite GEFRI score

Global rankRegional rankCountryScore
21Korea, Rep.79.67
32Singapore78.66
53Hong Kong SAR, China77.89
114Japan76.54
145Australia76.14
206New Zealand73.28
497Brunei Darussalam61.59
——Northern Mariana IslandsMicrostate61.59
508Thailand61.30
539Indonesia60.44
——NauruMicrostate59.98
——PalauMicrostate59.64
——American SamoaMicrostate59.46
——GuamMicrostate59.25
——New CaledoniaMicrostate59.13
5910Macao SAR, China58.49
——French PolynesiaMicrostate58.10
6611Viet Nam57.38
7112Fiji56.49
7213Mongolia56.33
7314Malaysia56.23
7515China55.15
——SamoaMicrostate53.13
8416Philippines52.72
——TuvaluFCSMicrostate51.68
——TongaMicrostate47.16
——KiribatiFCSMicrostate46.45
——Marshall IslandsFCSMicrostate46.17
——Micronesia, Fed. Sts.FCSMicrostate42.15
11017Timor-LesteFCS41.12
11218Vanuatu40.64
12419Korea, Dem. People's Rep.36.42
12920MyanmarFCS33.89
13121Cambodia33.02
13422Solomon IslandsFCS31.89
13723Lao PDR30.98
15324Papua New GuineaFCS25.55