Country profile

Timor-Leste

East Asia & PacificLower middle income1.40M inhabitants

Last updated April 1, 2026

FacebookTwitter/XLinkedInReddit
Fragile/Conflict-Affected Country: This country is classified as experiencing institutional and social fragility. Data may not reflect the current situation due to instability.

Composite GEFRI Score

Severely underprepared

Timor-Leste is severely underprepared (41st percentile worldwide). Key structural conditions limit capacity to plan, implement, and sustain forward-looking reforms. Higher scores indicate a system that is better prepared to anticipate and shape the future of learning.

41.78Composite score
Global percentile
41st
Global rank
#106
Regional rank
#17
Viewing data for
Infrastructure
52.85
28th percentileGlobal avg. 59.93
Human Capital
41.60
31st percentileGlobal avg. 47.03
Innovation
29.31
23rd percentileGlobal avg. 42.53
Governance
45.14
50th percentileGlobal avg. 47.71
Access & Parity
40.00
46th percentileGlobal avg. 43.89

Country profile

Timor-Leste trails global peers in Innovation (29, 23rd percentile). A coordinated reform effort is needed to strengthen education futures readiness.

Uneven scores across dimensions highlight areas that need targeted coordination. Low internet adoption slows digital participation and constrains system-wide modernization. Literacy or tertiary enrollment gaps thin the talent pipeline and limit the country’s capacity to develop future-ready skills.

Sparse R&D investment and a small research workforce slow experimentation and delay new ideas from reaching learners. Policy execution and regulatory capacity remain weak, leaving reforms fragmented and hard to sustain. Girls outperform boys in secondary pathways, adding pressure to address male dropout risks.

Infrastructure, Governance, Human Capital, and School Access and Gender Parity present a near-term leapfrog opportunity: performance is just below the global average, backed by enough observed data to support forward planning.

Note: Several indicators use imputed values. Policymakers and planners should validate results further before committing to major initiatives.

Key insights

  • Places 106th worldwide.
  • Holds a regional position of 17th within East Asia & Pacific.
  • Scores range from Infrastructure (52.9) to Innovation (29.3), reflecting variation across dimensions.
  • Trails regional peers most clearly in Innovation.

Regional peers: East Asia & Pacific

Composite GEFRI score

Global rankRegional rankCountryScore
21Korea, Rep.79.45
32Hong Kong SAR, China77.87
43Singapore77.24
244Japan70.54
255Australia70.53
346New Zealand68.21
——NauruMicrostate63.70
——PalauMicrostate63.63
——Northern Mariana IslandsMicrostate63.05
487Thailand61.33
——American SamoaMicrostate61.26
498Brunei Darussalam61.14
——GuamMicrostate60.51
549Indonesia60.06
5610Macao SAR, China59.92
——New CaledoniaMicrostate59.48
——French PolynesiaMicrostate58.74
6511Fiji57.04
6712Mongolia56.70
6813China56.42
7014Malaysia56.09
8015Philippines53.28
——TuvaluFCSMicrostate52.99
——SamoaMicrostate52.80
8316Viet Nam52.16
——TongaMicrostate46.68
——Marshall IslandsFCSMicrostate46.22
——KiribatiFCSMicrostate46.13
10617Timor-LesteFCS41.78
——Micronesia, Fed. Sts.FCSMicrostate40.44
11318Vanuatu39.11
11719Korea, Dem. People's Rep.37.93
12520MyanmarFCS35.50
13121Cambodia32.82
13622Solomon IslandsFCS31.58
13823Lao PDR30.78
15624Papua New GuineaFCS23.87