country profile

Lao PDR

East Asia & PacificLower middle income7.87M population

Last updated July 15, 2026

FacebookTwitter/XLinkedInReddit
Severely underprepared

Composite GEFRI Score

Severe readiness constraints across dimensions

Lao PDR shows severely limited readiness to meet the challenges and opportunities of education in a rapidly changing world (25th percentile worldwide). Key structural conditions limit capacity to plan, implement, and sustain forward-looking reforms.

32.64Composite score
Global percentile
25th
Global rank
#134
Regional rank
#22
Viewing data for
Emerging readiness
Infrastructure
52.17
34th percentileGlobal avg. 55.13
Critically unprepared
Human Capital
28.66
14th percentileGlobal avg. 47.36
Severely underprepared
Innovation
42.78
47th percentileGlobal avg. 46.19
Critically unprepared
Governance
29.61
20th percentileGlobal avg. 47.46
Critically unprepared
Access & Parity
10.00
33rd percentileGlobal avg. 48.49

Country profile

Lao PDR faces substantial readiness constraints across core dimensions. Its weakest results are in GEFRI Composite (33, 25th percentile), Governance (30, 20th percentile) and Human Capital (29, 14th percentile). These gaps continue to weigh on overall readiness.

Uneven scores across dimensions show where readiness conditions are less aligned. Literacy or tertiary enrollment gaps thin the talent pipeline and limit the country’s capacity to develop future-ready skills.

Sparse R&D investment and a small research workforce slow experimentation and delay new ideas from reaching learners. Policy execution and regulatory capacity remain weak, leaving reforms fragmented and hard to sustain. Gender parity leans toward boys in secondary pathways, signalling persistent barriers for girls.

Infrastructure presents a near-term leapfrog opportunity: performance is just below the global average, backed by enough observed data to support forward planning. Regionally, School Access and Gender Parity lags peers the most, signalling where investment could have the highest impact.

Most indicators are observed rather than imputed, so estimation uncertainty is limited.

Key insights

Falls below many peers at the 25th percentile.

Places 134th worldwide.

Holds a regional position of 22nd within East Asia & Pacific.

Scores range from Infrastructure (52.2) to Access & Parity (10.0), reflecting variation across dimensions.

Trails regional peers most clearly in Access & Parity.

Regional peers: East Asia & Pacific

Composite GEFRI Score

Global rankRegional rankCountryScore
21Korea, Rep.77.90
32Hong Kong SAR, China77.59
43Singapore77.58
124Japan76.03
145Australia75.84
206New Zealand72.96
467Brunei Darussalam61.47
NauruMicrostate60.97
Northern Mariana IslandsMicrostate60.89
498Fiji60.57
509Thailand60.56
GuamMicrostate59.78
New CaledoniaMicrostate59.45
PalauMicrostate59.12
American SamoaMicrostate58.64
6110Macao SAR, China58.41
French PolynesiaMicrostate57.22
6811Indonesia56.89
6912Mongolia56.89
7113Malaysia56.62
7314Viet Nam55.90
7515China55.59
8716Philippines51.84
SamoaMicrostate51.51
TuvaluFCSMicrostate51.41
TongaMicrostate48.23
KiribatiFCSMicrostate46.37
Marshall IslandsFCSMicrostate45.13
Micronesia, Fed. Sts.FCSMicrostate41.97
11217Vanuatu40.83
11318Timor-LesteFCS40.80
11519Korea, Dem. People's Rep.39.28
12320Cambodia35.88
13121Solomon IslandsFCS33.48
13422Lao PDR32.64
14723Papua New GuineaFCS27.72
15124MyanmarFCS26.22