Country profile

Marshall Islands

East Asia & PacificUpper middle income38K inhabitants

Last updated April 1, 2026

FacebookTwitter/XLinkedInReddit
Fragile/Conflict-Affected Country: This country is classified as experiencing institutional and social fragility. Data may not reflect the current situation due to instability.
Microstate notice: This country is classified as a microstate (population under 300,000) and is indexed but not included in GEFRI global or regional rankings.

Composite GEFRI Score

Emerging readiness

Marshall Islands demonstrates early-stage readiness (43rd percentile worldwide). Investments are generating initial gains, yet substantial gaps persist in several dimensions. Higher scores indicate a system that is better prepared to anticipate and shape the future of learning.

46.22Composite score
Global percentile
43rd
Global rank
Not ranked (microstate)
Regional rank
Not ranked (microstate)
Viewing data for
Infrastructure
57.37
32nd percentileGlobal avg. 59.93
Human Capital
54.05
62nd percentileGlobal avg. 47.03
Innovation
39.86
49th percentileGlobal avg. 42.53
Governance
58.26
71st percentileGlobal avg. 47.71
Access & Parity
21.58
37th percentileGlobal avg. 43.89

Country profile

Marshall Islands performs close to the global average across all GEFRI dimensions. Progress is evident, yet stronger ambition is needed to reach futures readiness among global peers.

Uneven scores across dimensions highlight areas that need targeted coordination. Limited tertiary enrollment narrows future talent pipelines and innovation capacity.

R&D investment remains modest, affecting long-term innovation potential. Regulatory quality falls short of global standards, signalling structural hurdles in policy execution. Girls outperform boys in secondary pathways, adding pressure to address male dropout risks.

Infrastructure presents a near-term leapfrog opportunity: performance is just below the global average, backed by enough observed data to support forward planning.

Note: Several indicators use imputed values. Policymakers and planners should validate results further before committing to major initiatives.

Key insights

  • Scores range from Governance (58.3) to Access & Parity (21.6), reflecting variation across dimensions.
  • Trails regional peers most clearly in Access & Parity.

Regional peers: East Asia & Pacific

Composite GEFRI score

Global rankRegional rankCountryScore
21Korea, Rep.79.45
32Hong Kong SAR, China77.87
43Singapore77.24
244Japan70.54
255Australia70.53
346New Zealand68.21
——NauruMicrostate63.70
——PalauMicrostate63.63
——Northern Mariana IslandsMicrostate63.05
487Thailand61.33
——American SamoaMicrostate61.26
498Brunei Darussalam61.14
——GuamMicrostate60.51
549Indonesia60.06
5610Macao SAR, China59.92
——New CaledoniaMicrostate59.48
——French PolynesiaMicrostate58.74
6511Fiji57.04
6712Mongolia56.70
6813China56.42
7014Malaysia56.09
8015Philippines53.28
——TuvaluFCSMicrostate52.99
——SamoaMicrostate52.80
8316Viet Nam52.16
——TongaMicrostate46.68
——Marshall IslandsFCSMicrostate46.22
——KiribatiFCSMicrostate46.13
10617Timor-LesteFCS41.78
——Micronesia, Fed. Sts.FCSMicrostate40.44
11318Vanuatu39.11
11719Korea, Dem. People's Rep.37.93
12520MyanmarFCS35.50
13121Cambodia32.82
13622Solomon IslandsFCS31.58
13823Lao PDR30.78
15624Papua New GuineaFCS23.87