Insights — GEFRI global dashboard

Track how 21st-century readiness shifts across the Global Education Futures Readiness Index (GEFRI).

Global overview

Countries tracked

All jurisdictions in GEFRI.

Global average readiness

0.00

Mean GEFRI score worldwide (median: 0.00).

Range and variation

0 0

Standard deviation (σ): 0.00 points.

Median gap to target (75)

75.00

Points the median system must gain to reach the readiness benchmark minimum of 75.

Quick facts

Compare readiness metrics, identify outliers, and jump to any country profile with the lookup tool.

The world at a glance

Education futures readiness band snapshot

Share of countries across GEFRI composite score bands.

Critically unprepared (≤30): 0 countries (0%)
Severely underprepared (31–45): 0 countries (0%)
Emerging readiness (46–60): 0 countries (0%)
Progressing readiness (61–75): 0 countries (0%)
Advanced readiness (76–90): 0 countries (0%)
Future-ready leader (>90): 0 countries (0%)
Critically unprepared (≤30)Severely underprepared (31–45)Emerging readiness (46–60)Progressing readiness (61–75)Advanced readiness (76–90)Future-ready leader (>90)
Critically unprepared (≤30)
0 countries · 0%
Severely underprepared (31–45)
0 countries · 0%
Emerging readiness (46–60)
0 countries · 0%
Progressing readiness (61–75)
0 countries · 0%
Advanced readiness (76–90)
0 countries · 0%
Future-ready leader (>90)
0 countries · 0%

Global education futures readiness distribution

The histogram summarises how GEFRI composite scores are distributed. Use it to see whether readiness concentrates near the global mean or stretches toward the extremes.

Regional insights

Explore average component scores by region to pinpoint where capabilities are strongest and where additional coordination could close gaps.

Blue line: Global mean for the selected component.

Red line: Readiness target of 75.

Fragility and conflict-affected states

Fragile and conflict-affected states (FCS) operate under conditions of instability that disrupt educational delivery, weaken institutional capacity, and constrain long-term planning. Comparing FCS scores with other countries highlights where readiness gaps are most persistent and where targeted support or cooperation could have the greatest effect.

  • Number of FCS countries:
  • Mean GEFRI score (FCS): · σ =
  • Mean GEFRI score (non-FCS): · σ =
  • Difference in average GEFRI score (non-FCS − FCS): points
  • Percentile position — FCS: ; Non-FCS:
Data coverage for variability is incomplete, so interpret the gap cautiously. Conditions in FCS contexts can shift quickly, and data refreshes may lag real-world events.

Component gaps