Country profile

Kiribati

East Asia & PacificLower middle income135K inhabitants

Last updated April 1, 2026

FacebookTwitter/XLinkedInReddit
Fragile/Conflict-Affected Country: This country is classified as experiencing institutional and social fragility. Data may not reflect the current situation due to instability.
Microstate notice: This country is classified as a microstate (population under 300,000) and is indexed but not included in GEFRI global or regional rankings.

Composite GEFRI Score

Emerging readiness

Kiribati demonstrates early-stage readiness (43rd percentile worldwide). Investments are generating initial gains, yet substantial gaps persist in several dimensions. Higher scores indicate a system that is better prepared to anticipate and shape the future of learning.

46.13Composite score
Global percentile
43rd
Global rank
Not ranked (microstate)
Regional rank
Not ranked (microstate)
Viewing data for
Infrastructure
64.32
40th percentileGlobal avg. 59.93
Human Capital
63.99
92nd percentileGlobal avg. 47.03
Innovation
16.41
2nd percentileGlobal avg. 42.53
Governance
57.92
71st percentileGlobal avg. 47.71
Access & Parity
28.00
39th percentileGlobal avg. 43.89

Country profile

Kiribati shows strong future-readiness momentum, with clear strengths in Human Capital (64, 92nd percentile).

Wide gaps between dimensions reveal structural weaknesses that slow coordinated progress. High internet adoption enables broad participation in digital learning and innovation. Limited tertiary enrollment narrows future talent pipelines and innovation capacity.

Sparse R&D investment and a small research workforce slow experimentation and delay new ideas from reaching learners. Policy execution and regulatory capacity remain weak, leaving reforms fragmented and hard to sustain. Girls outperform boys in secondary pathways, adding pressure to address male dropout risks.

Challenges: Innovation (16, 2nd percentile). Closing these gaps will be key to sustaining progress.

Areas with room to grow: Infrastructure (64, 40th percentile) and School Access and Gender Parity (28, 39th percentile). These dimensions sit close to global norms and could accelerate quickly with targeted investment.

Note: Several indicators use imputed values. Policymakers and planners should validate results further before committing to major initiatives.

Key insights

  • Scores range from Infrastructure (64.3) to Innovation (16.4), reflecting variation across dimensions.
  • Trails regional peers most clearly in Innovation.

Regional peers: East Asia & Pacific

Composite GEFRI score

Global rankRegional rankCountryScore
21Korea, Rep.79.45
32Hong Kong SAR, China77.87
43Singapore77.24
244Japan70.54
255Australia70.53
346New Zealand68.21
——NauruMicrostate63.70
——PalauMicrostate63.63
——Northern Mariana IslandsMicrostate63.05
487Thailand61.33
——American SamoaMicrostate61.26
498Brunei Darussalam61.14
——GuamMicrostate60.51
549Indonesia60.06
5610Macao SAR, China59.92
——New CaledoniaMicrostate59.48
——French PolynesiaMicrostate58.74
6511Fiji57.04
6712Mongolia56.70
6813China56.42
7014Malaysia56.09
8015Philippines53.28
——TuvaluFCSMicrostate52.99
——SamoaMicrostate52.80
8316Viet Nam52.16
——TongaMicrostate46.68
——Marshall IslandsFCSMicrostate46.22
——KiribatiFCSMicrostate46.13
10617Timor-LesteFCS41.78
——Micronesia, Fed. Sts.FCSMicrostate40.44
11318Vanuatu39.11
11719Korea, Dem. People's Rep.37.93
12520MyanmarFCS35.50
13121Cambodia32.82
13622Solomon IslandsFCS31.58
13823Lao PDR30.78
15624Papua New GuineaFCS23.87